The judgment highlights that GST penalties require proof of intent to evade tax; mere technical lapses, such as e-way bill expiry due to traffic restrictions, are ...
The Court held that a penalty under Section 129 was unsustainable where the e-way bill had been generated before the goods were detained. It ruled that no intention to evade tax could be inferred when ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback