This paper describes the eccentricity, amplitude, phase shift, angular momentum, polarization, radial path, and orbital ...
The Christian Post on MSNOpinion
10 ways the Christian worldview developed modern science
By examining Kepler s worldview, we can see at least 10 ways the Christian faith fostered the development of modern science ...
Arnaud Girod, head of economics and cross asset strategy at Kepler Cheuvreux, discusses the outlook for fixed income markets ...
In Pythagoras' harmony of the spheres, celestial bodies follow mathematical proportions that correspond to musical intervals.
The spin-down of cool stars on the main-sequence, like our Sun, is a critical area of modern astrophysics, with strong links ...
Home > Press release: Prof. Dr. Jean-Michel Désert leads new ...
Interesting Engineering on MSN
Planets near stars could surprisingly form water, study turns old theories on head
Simply identifying why some planets are wet and others are dry could go a long way toward narrowing down the search. A team of researchers has demonstrated a new way in which sub-Neptune-sized ...
Relationship to Speed: When a planet is closer to the Sun (near perihelion), it must move faster to sweep out the same area in a given time as when it is farther from the Sun (near aphelion).
When the phrase "two spacecraft are following paths in space given by" is used, it implies that we have access to this kind of information for both spacecraft, usually in the form of mathematical ...
Space.com on MSN
NASA's next-gen Roman Space Telescope is surprising scientists with its capabilities. It hasn't even launched yet
"Asteroseismology with Roman is possible because we don't need to ask the telescope to do anything it wasn't already planning to do." ...
Indian Defence Review on MSN
This ‘Planet’ Shouldn’t Exist—but Einstein Predicted It 88 Years Ago
NASA found what looked like a planet, but its behavior was bizarre. Turns out, Einstein saw it coming, 88 years ago.
Morningstar Quantitative Ratings for Stocks are generated using an algorithm that compares companies that are not under analyst coverage to peer companies that do receive analyst-driven ratings.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results