Supreme Court justices on Monday returned to the bench to issue opinions in person for the first time in nearly three years — and went 1 for 2.

In the aftermath of a divisive election, a riot at the US Capitol and the unprecedented final days of the Trump administration, the Supreme Court kept many controversial issues in a holding ...

For example, the court last year was called upon to decide whether the White House could be forced to turn over emails and other documents to the National Archives and the House committee ...

The Court cited recent amendments to NEPA limiting the timing and length of NEPA documents to reinforce the principle that agency explanations need not be excessively detailed. Id. n.3.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is speaking with one voice in response to recent criticism of the justices’ ethical practices: No need to fix what isn’t broken. The justices’ …

Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case involving an executive order that purports to eliminate birthright citizenship.