News
Supreme Court Clears The Way For Mass Federal Layoffs. What It Means For Workers Now
The administration argues that the president does not need additional authorization from Congress to conduct agency-wide layoffs. Attorney General Pam Bondi praised the Supreme Court’s order, saying it “stopped lawless lower courts from restricting President Trump’s authority over federal personnel.”
Former government employees are finding that perhaps the only thing harder than getting laid off from the federal government ...
Federal agencies across government can resume laying off their employees en masse after the Supreme Court reversed a court ...
The Trump administration will reduce planned federal worker layoffs, a personnel official said on Monday, after tens of ...
It remains unclear how many of the roughly 2 million federal employees spread across the country could lose their jobs under the new layoff plans, called a "reduction in force" or RIF. The memo ...
Veterans have historically had a lower unemployment rate than non-veterans. But one driver has shifted significantly this ...
A U.S. diplomat laid off from the State Department after over 20 years says cutting the types of programs she worked on will ...
The White House is scrutinizing layoff plans by federal agencies in an effort to limit further court challenges after the ...
Shannon Ellis, head of the union that represents Kansas City IRS employees, said the Trump administration won’t even confirm ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback